Ernest Subramaniam

Ernest Subramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in banking and finance and credit and security.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in banking and finance and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Banking and Finance	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Letter of undertaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractual Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Judgments	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Actions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantor's Liability	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Subramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ernest Subramaniam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Jimmy Yap & Co	1 cases	100% of cases	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Enforcement of Trust Deed, Security Deed & Moneylenders Act(Mar 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ernest Subramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ernest Subramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
USD	42,080,000.00	42,080,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	DB Trustees v Consult Asia: Enforcement of Trust Deed, Security Deed & Moneylenders Act 12 Mar 2009 Consult Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	12 Mar 2009	Consult Asia Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim Allowed in PartDefendant shall pay the plaintiff a sum of US$42,080,000 to redeem the US$32 million Notes together with interest to be calculated in accordance with the Trust Deed and the conditions of the Notes; such payment shall be made by 4 pm, 29 April 2009, failing which an ‘Event of Default’ within the meaning of the Conditions of the Notes shall be deemed to have occurred.