Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam

Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2008. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in easements and property law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and easements.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Extinguishment	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Arfat Selvam Alliance LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Lee Tat v MCST Plan No 301: Easement Extinguishment & Right of Way Dispute(Nov 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ernest Yogarajah s/o Balasubramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Tat v MCST Plan No 301: Easement Extinguishment & Right of Way Dispute 30 Nov 2008 Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	30 Nov 2008	Lee Tat Development Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the decision of the Judge that the MC is entitled to repair and/or maintain the Right of Way is set aside.