Ervin Tan

Ervin Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and civil practice. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ervin Tan has demonstrated expertise across 17 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and banking and finance.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Joinder	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ervin Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ervin Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ascendant Legal LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance(Mar 2021)
Adroit Law LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Yeo Su Lan v Thomas Hong: Consolidation of Suits & Joinder of Co-Plaintiffs in Counterclaim(Feb 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ervin Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	19.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ervin Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Yeo Su Lan v Thomas Hong: Consolidation of Suits & Joinder of Co-Plaintiffs in Counterclaim 23 Feb 2023 Soup Empire Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Lost	23 Feb 2023	Soup Empire Holdings Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal was dismissed.
2	Carlsberg v CSAPL: Breach of Contract & Best Efforts in Director Attendance 11 Mar 2021 Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff)Lost	11 Mar 2021	Carlsberg Breweries A/S (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedCarlsberg's claim for repayment of the outstanding loan was dismissed as the court found that CSAPLH did not breach clause 2(c) of the Deed of Undertaking.