Esther Tang

Esther Tang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in misuse of drugs act and mischief. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Esther Tang has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Mischief	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Community-based sentencing options	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Esther Tang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Esther Tang has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	3 cases	100% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chang Heng: Mischief & Community-Based Sentencing(Dec 2017) Pham Duyen Quyen v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2017) Obioha v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking(Nov 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Esther Tang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Esther Tang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Teo Chang Heng: Mischief & Community-Based Sentencing 07 Dec 2017 Public Prosecutor (Appellant)Lost	07 Dec 2017	Public Prosecutor (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe prosecution's appeal against the sentence was dismissed.
2	Pham Duyen Quyen v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Jun 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Jun 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction and Sentence AffirmedThe Court of Appeal affirmed the High Court's decision on conviction and sentence.
3	Obioha v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution and Setting Aside Death Sentence for Drug Trafficking 16 Nov 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 Nov 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for stay of execution and setting aside death sentence was dismissed.