Eugene Neo

Eugene Neo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eugene Neo has demonstrated expertise across 9 primary practice areas, with significant experience in family law and torts.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Family Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy	1 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Accessory liability	1 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Eugene Neo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eugene Neo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
TSMP Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability(Mar 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eugene Neo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%
Partial	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eugene Neo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	20,000.00	20,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Liang Xihong v Loong Soo Min: Oppression, Breach of Trust, Conspiracy & Accessory Liability 30 Mar 2023 Yangbum Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Mar 2023	Yangbum Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial WinSandy is to pay Yangbum costs in respect of her claims in S 275 for an account of dividends and for reinstatement as a joint signatory to Yangbum’s bank accounts, fixed at S$20,000 inclusive of disbursements. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.