Eugene Quah

Eugene Quah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and employment law. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eugene Quah has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced54% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract of service	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employees’ Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Right of Set-Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Memorandum of Lien	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eugene Quah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eugene Quah has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier	2 cases	50% of cases	Shepherd Andrew v BIL International Ltd: Employment Contract, Severance Payments & Right of Set-Off(Jul 2003) Han Min v First Commercial Bank: Lien Validity & Bank's Duty of Care(May 2002)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Wong Loke Cheng v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Bribery, and Findings of Fact in Shipping Charter Case(Dec 2002)
RHTLaw Taylor Wessing LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Encus International Pte Ltd v Tenacious Investment Pte Ltd: Avoidance of Transactions, Unfair Preference, Anti-Deprivation Principle(Mar 2016)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eugene Quah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.6
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Lost	26.3 parties avg	6.3	50%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eugene Quah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(25%)	25%
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Encus International Pte Ltd v Tenacious Investment Pte Ltd: Avoidance of Transactions, Unfair Preference, Anti-Deprivation Principle 30 Mar 2016 GCL HOLDINGS (BVI) LTD (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2016	GCL HOLDINGS (BVI) LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the defendant; the court declared the CSTA null and void and ordered the return of the shares. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Shepherd Andrew v BIL International Ltd: Employment Contract, Severance Payments & Right of Set-Off 07 Jul 2003 BIL International Ltd (Defendant)Dismissed	07 Jul 2003	BIL International Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim DismissedDefendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
3	Wong Loke Cheng v Public Prosecutor: Corruption, Bribery, and Findings of Fact in Shipping Charter Case 10 Dec 2002 Wong Loke Cheng (Appellant)Lost	10 Dec 2002	Wong Loke Cheng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence was dismissed.
4	Han Min v First Commercial Bank: Lien Validity & Bank's Duty of Care 19 May 2002 Han Min (Plaintiff)Won	19 May 2002	Han Min (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe memoranda are not binding on the plaintiff and his deposits are to be restored together with such interest which would have accrued had they not been uplifted. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.