Eunice Chew

Eunice Chew is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in defamation and quasi-partnership. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 60% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eunice Chew has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in company law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Company Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Defamation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Quasi-partnership	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of duty of fidelity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Partnership Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eunice Chew has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eunice Chew has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Hady Hartanto v Yee Kit Hong: Defamation Claim over SGXNET Announcement(Mar 2014) Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Defamation, Justification, and Qualified Privilege(Jun 2010) Tan Hup Thye v Refco: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Bonus Entitlements Dispute(May 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eunice Chew's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 3 (60%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	53.5 parties avg	3.5	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eunice Chew's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	5(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hady Hartanto v Yee Kit Hong: Defamation Claim over SGXNET Announcement 03 Mar 2014 Ko (Defendant)Won	03 Mar 2014	Ko (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for Defendant; claim dismissed on grounds of justification and qualified privilege. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kay Swee Pin v Singapore Island Country Club: Defamation, Justification, and Qualified Privilege 09 Jun 2010 General Committee of the SICC (Defendant)Won	09 Jun 2010	General Committee of the SICC (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tan Hup Thye v Refco: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Bonus Entitlements Dispute 10 May 2010 Refco (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in members' voluntary liquidation) (Defendant)Won	10 May 2010	Refco (Singapore) Pte Ltd (in members' voluntary liquidation) (Defendant): Judgment on CounterclaimJudgment given to the defendant on its counterclaim for damages to be assessed.
4	Baldor Electric v Liew Chin Choy: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Conspiracy 27 Jan 2010 Baldor Electric (Asia) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	27 Jan 2010	Baldor Electric (Asia) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff against the first defendant, Liew Chin Choy, for breach of duty of fidelity and good faith. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Eng Gee Seng v Quek Choon Teck: Minority Oppression in Quasi-Partnership Duck Abattoir 17 Sep 2009 Eng Gee Seng (Plaintiff)Won	17 Sep 2009	Eng Gee Seng (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim under Section 216 of the Companies Act was allowed. The court ordered the 1st and 2nd Defendants to purchase the Plaintiff’s shares in the 3rd Defendant. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.