Eunice Lau

Eunice Lau is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2016 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eunice Lau has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal revision and criminal law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Revision	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Abetment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Adducing fresh evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sexual assault by penetration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lau has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eunice Lau has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	50% of cases	Public Prosecutor v BUT: Abetment of Rape and Sexual Assault by Penetration(Feb 2019) Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2016)
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	50% of cases	Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond: Oppression of Minority Shareholder Claim(Apr 2021) SK Lateral v Lateral Solutions: Security for Costs in International Commercial Dispute(Apr 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eunice Lau's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.5
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eunice Lau's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Wei Fengpin v Low Tuck Loong Raymond: Oppression of Minority Shareholder Claim 14 Apr 2021 Wei Fengpin (Plaintiff)Partial	14 Apr 2021	Wei Fengpin (Plaintiff): Claim Allowed in PartThe court found that the Defendants had engaged in oppressive conduct and ordered Low and Sim to make restitution to the company for the improperly received dividends and bonuses.
2	SK Lateral v Lateral Solutions: Security for Costs in International Commercial Dispute 16 Apr 2020 SK Lateral Rubber & Plastic Technologies (Suzhou) Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Counterdefendant)Won	16 Apr 2020	SK Lateral Rubber & Plastic Technologies (Suzhou) Co Ltd (Plaintiff, Counterdefendant): Application dismissedLateral's application for security of costs was dismissed, and SKL is entitled to its costs of the application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Public Prosecutor v BUT: Abetment of Rape and Sexual Assault by Penetration 17 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	17 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Successful ProsecutionThe accused was found guilty and sentenced.
4	Mohd Suief v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Jan 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal by Mohd Suief bin Ismail was dismissed, upholding the original conviction and sentence.