Eunice Lim

Eunice Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in intellectual property law and patents. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Eunice Lim has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unfair Competition	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Guidelines	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Medicines Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Eunice Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Eunice Lim has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	3 cases	75% of cases	AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act s12A, Product Licensing(Jan 2012) Ozone Community Corp v Advance Magazine Publishers: Trade Mark Dispute over 'HYSTERIC GLAMOUR' and 'GLAMOUR'(Jan 2010) Inphosoft Pte Ltd v Ho Jin Kiat: Copyright Infringement & Search Order Dispute(Jun 2009)
Attorney-General’s Chambers	1 cases	25% of cases	PP v Marzuki bin Ahmad: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Penalty for Accepting Gratification(Aug 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Eunice Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Eunice Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,500.00	6,500.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Marzuki bin Ahmad: Corruption, Prevention of Corruption Act, Penalty for Accepting Gratification 26 Aug 2014 Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	26 Aug 2014	Public Prosecutor (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in part and allowed in partThe Prosecution's appeal to enhance the aggregate sentence of eight months’ imprisonment was dismissed, but its appeal against the District Judge’s decision not to order a penalty under s 13(2) was allowed. The Accused was ordered to pay a sum of $6,500 as a penalty under s 13(2). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	AstraZeneca v Sanofi-Aventis: Patent Infringement, Medicines Act s12A, Product Licensing 18 Jan 2012 Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	18 Jan 2012	Sanofi-Aventis Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
3	Ozone Community Corp v Advance Magazine Publishers: Trade Mark Dispute over 'HYSTERIC GLAMOUR' and 'GLAMOUR' 14 Jan 2010 Advance Magazine Publishers Inc (Respondent)Lost	14 Jan 2010	Advance Magazine Publishers Inc (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and ordered to pay costs of the appeal and the costs of the hearing before the PAR to Ozone.
4	Inphosoft Pte Ltd v Ho Jin Kiat: Copyright Infringement & Search Order Dispute 29 Jun 2009 Foo Guowei Derek (Other)Won	29 Jun 2009	Foo Guowei Derek (Other): Application for return of black box allowedThe proposed intervener's application to be added as a party to Summons 4795 and for a return of the black box seized was allowed.