Ezekiel Peter Latimer

Ezekiel Peter Latimer is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and sentencing. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Mental Capacity Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's fees	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accidents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Ezekiel Peter Latimer has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Ezekiel Peter Latimer has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Peter Ezekiel & Co	2 cases	100% of cases	Riaz LLC v Sharil bin Abbas: Mental Capacity Act & Solicitor's Costs Dispute(Jun 2013) Kalaiarasi v PP: Bankruptcy Act Offences and Conditional Discharge for Kindergarten Teacher(Mar 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ezekiel Peter Latimer's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ezekiel Peter Latimer's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Riaz LLC v Sharil bin Abbas: Mental Capacity Act & Solicitor's Costs Dispute 24 Jun 2013 Riaz LLC (Applicant)Lost	24 Jun 2013	Riaz LLC (Applicant): Costs Not AllowedThe court did not allow any costs to the applicant under this bill and ordered the applicant to bear the costs of the taxation proceedings, including the costs relating to Dr Ho’s attendance. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Kalaiarasi v PP: Bankruptcy Act Offences and Conditional Discharge for Kindergarten Teacher 18 Mar 2012 Kalaiarasi d/o Marimuthu Innasimuthu (Appellant, Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2012	Kalaiarasi d/o Marimuthu Innasimuthu (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and a conditional discharge for 12 months was granted.