Fah Serena

Fah Serena is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and insolvency law.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Fah Serena has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in bankruptcy and chancery and equity.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Bankruptcy	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Proprietary Estoppel	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Choses in Action	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Assignment	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Fah Serena has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Fah Serena has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advent Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	Sutherland v Official Assignee: Ratification of Assignment Agreement & Priority of Repayment(Mar 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fah Serena's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fah Serena's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Neutral	1(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Sutherland v Official Assignee: Ratification of Assignment Agreement & Priority of Repayment 18 Mar 2021 Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent)Neutral	18 Mar 2021	Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited (Respondent): NeutralThe judgment does not specify a win or loss for Oversea-Chinese Banking Corporation Limited.