Fan Kin Ning

Fan Kin Ning is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 5 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and judgments and orders. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Recognition of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Beneficiaries Rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inherent Power of the Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Option to Purchase	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Fan Kin Ning has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Fan Kin Ning has been affiliated with 5 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
David Ong & Partners	2 cases	33% of cases	Madihill Development v Sinesinga: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Pending Appeals(Oct 2011) Goh Lye Chin Raymond v Poon Soon Chin: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase for Property(Aug 2010)
Tan Kim Seng & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Tan Heng Khoon v Wang Shing He: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal(Sep 2024)
DOP Law Corporation	1 cases	17% of cases	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute(Nov 2022)
WLAW LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	American Express Bank v Abdul Manaff: Garnishment of Wages under SCJA(Oct 2003)
William Lai & Alan Wong	1 cases	17% of cases	Bayerische Landesbank v Dato Azlan: Amending Summary Judgment for Overstated Sum(Sep 2002)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fan Kin Ning's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.1
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	50%
Neutral	110.0 parties avg	10.0	17%
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fan Kin Ning's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Won	2(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3
USD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tan Heng Khoon v Wang Shing He: Extension of Time to File Notice of Appeal 17 Sep 2024 Wang Shing He (Respondent)Lost	17 Sep 2024	Wang Shing He (Respondent): Application DeniedThe respondent's objection to the application was not successful.
2	Lim Lai Soon v Tan Hong Sin: Beneficial Ownership of Shares & Patents Dispute 17 Nov 2022 Koh Choon Heong (Defendant)Neutral	17 Nov 2022	Koh Choon Heong (Defendant): NeutralThe sixth defendant did not take a position in the dispute.
3	Madihill Development v Sinesinga: Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act & Pending Appeals 20 Oct 2011 Dato’ Rickie Tang Yong Kiat (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	20 Oct 2011	Dato’ Rickie Tang Yong Kiat (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the registration of the Malaysian judgment was dismissed. No monetary amount was specified.
4	Goh Lye Chin Raymond v Poon Soon Chin: Specific Performance of Option to Purchase for Property 11 Aug 2010 Ong Siah Liyo (Plaintiff)Won	11 Aug 2010	Ong Siah Liyo (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff, with specific performance of the option to purchase ordered. Damages, interest and adjustments relating to any tenancy to be assessed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	American Express Bank v Abdul Manaff: Garnishment of Wages under SCJA 21 Oct 2003 Standard Chartered Bank Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Creditor)Lost	21 Oct 2003	Standard Chartered Bank Ltd (Appellant, Judgment Creditor): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; the court ruled that wages or salary is exempted from garnishment (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Bayerische Landesbank v Dato Azlan: Amending Summary Judgment for Overstated Sum 08 Sep 2002 Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	08 Sep 2002	Bayerische Landesbank Girozentrale (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed to amend the judgment to reflect the correct amount due.