Felicia Tan

Felicia Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and international arbitration. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Felicia Tan has demonstrated expertise across 34 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Illegality and public policy	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Choice of Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Comity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary relationships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unregistered charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lien over sub-freights and sub-hire	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Non-registration of charges	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of time to register	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitrability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Lease Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agreements to stifle prosecution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Felicia Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Felicia Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	4 cases	67% of cases	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Dispute over Waterfront Redevelopment(Nov 2013) Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd(Aug 2013) AJU v AJT: Setting Aside Interim Award Based on Illegality of Concluding Agreement(Aug 2011)
Incisive Law LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Duncan v Diablo Fortune: Lien on Sub-Freights, Non-Registration of Charges, and Arbitrability in Insolvency(Jul 2017)
Allen and Gledhill LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute(Jan 2011)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Felicia Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.3 parties avg	2.3	50%
Won	32.8 parties avg	2.8	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Felicia Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50%)	50%
Won	3(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,109,419.76	554,709.882 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2013	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Duncan v Diablo Fortune: Lien on Sub-Freights, Non-Registration of Charges, and Arbitrability in Insolvency 17 Jul 2017 Diablo Fortune Inc (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	17 Jul 2017	Diablo Fortune Inc (Defendant, Applicant): Applications DismissedApplications in Originating Summons No 307 of 2017 and Summons No 1317 of 2017 dismissed.
2	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Lease Renewal Dispute over Waterfront Redevelopment 06 Nov 2013 Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff)Won	06 Nov 2013	Jurong Town Corporation (Defendant, Plaintiff): Claim AllowedJTC's claim against UDL Marine was allowed for double rent, reinstatement costs, and rent for the reinstatement period, totaling $1,109,419.76 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Yeoh Wee Liat v Wong Lock Chee: Dispute over Share Ownership in Next Capital Pte Ltd 19 Aug 2013 HRT Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Aug 2013	HRT Corporation Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffCourt ordered Wong to rectify the share register of NCPL to reflect HRT's entitlement to 33% of the shareholding in NCPL (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	AJU v AJT: Setting Aside Interim Award Based on Illegality of Concluding Agreement 21 Aug 2011 AJT (Respondent)Lost	21 Aug 2011	AJT (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs here and below as well as the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	UDL Marine v Jurong Town Corp: Proprietary Estoppel & Lease Renewal Dispute 02 Jan 2011 Jurong Town Corp (Defendant)Lost	02 Jan 2011	Jurong Town Corp (Defendant): Application to strike out Statement of Claim DismissedDefendant’s striking out application in Summons 5748 of 2010 is dismissed.
6	AJT v AJU: Setting Aside Arbitration Award for Illegality and Public Policy 15 Jul 2010 AJT (Plaintiff)Won	15 Jul 2010	AJT (Plaintiff): Application to set aside the Award allowedApplication to set aside the Award allowed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.