Fong Shu Jan Jasmine

Fong Shu Jan Jasmine is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2010 to 2010. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and costs. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has demonstrated expertise across 4 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and costs.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	25% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 25% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Fong Shu Jan Jasmine has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	1 cases	100% of cases	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Costs Allocation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim(Sep 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fong Shu Jan Jasmine's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	17.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fong Shu Jan Jasmine's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Raffles Town Club v Lim Eng Hock Peter: Costs Allocation for Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim 29 Sep 2010 Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Third Party, Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2010	Tung Yu-Lien Margaret (Third Party, Respondent): Third Party Claim DismissedThird party claim against Margaret Tung dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.