Foo Chuan Min Jerald

Foo Chuan Min Jerald is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in credit and security and libel, slander and defamation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated expertise across 26 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Land	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Equitable Lien	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restoration of struck-off company	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Voluntary conveyance to defraud creditors	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Purchaser's Lien	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Business Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Chuan Min Jerald has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Chuan Min Jerald has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Cavenagh Law LLP	2 cases	50% of cases	Ezion Holdings Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Defamation Claim & Striking Out Plea of Malice(Jun 2017) PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale(May 2017)
Oon & Bazul LLP	1 cases	25% of cases	Rothstar Group v Leow Quek Shiong: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue and Voluntary Conveyances(Mar 2022)
Selvam LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Fu Zhihui Alvin v ACRA: Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Investments(Jun 2023)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Chuan Min Jerald's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	22.7 parties avg	2.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Chuan Min Jerald's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	2,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fu Zhihui Alvin v ACRA: Restoration of Struck-Off Company for Investments 25 Jun 2023 Authorities Services Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	25 Jun 2023	Authorities Services Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application GrantedThe application to restore Authorities Services Pte Ltd to the Register was granted.
2	Rothstar Group v Leow Quek Shiong: Avoidance of Transactions at Undervalue and Voluntary Conveyances 20 Mar 2022 Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	20 Mar 2022	Rothstar Group Limited (Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant): Appeal DismissedRothstar's appeals were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ezion Holdings Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Defamation Claim & Striking Out Plea of Malice 01 Jun 2017 Credit Suisse AG (Defendant, Respondent)Won	01 Jun 2017	Credit Suisse AG (Defendant, Respondent): Plea of Malice Struck OutPlea of malice struck out; Credit Suisse awarded costs of $4,000 with reasonable disbursements from Ezion. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	PACC Offshore Services v Kensteel Engineering: Equitable Lien & Caveat Dispute in Property Sale 14 May 2017 PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	14 May 2017	PACC Offshore Services Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Caveat to remain unless the defendant is able to provide an alternative form of securityThe court ordered that the caveat remain in place pending the outcome of Suit 898, unless the defendant provides security for the plaintiff's claim for the return of the deposit in the amount of $4,066,000.