Foo Jyh Howe

Foo Jyh Howe is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2024 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in costs and civil practice. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in costs and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Costs	2 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized99% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Pre-judgment interest	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Jyh Howe has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Jyh Howe has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
FC Legal Asia LLC	3 cases	100% of cases	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest(Oct 2024) Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims(Aug 2024) Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cross-Border Dispute(Apr 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Jyh Howe's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2024	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Jyh Howe's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Partial	1(33%)	33%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,290,500.00	645,250.002 cases	2
USD	10,000,000.00	10,000,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2024	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over Bond Amount Release and Pre-Judgment Interest 17 Oct 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Partial	17 Oct 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Partial WinTIL was awarded $790,500 in costs and disbursements, but pre-judgment interest was denied. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Dispute over US$10 Million Bond Account & Contingent Claims 19 Aug 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Won	19 Aug 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Judgment for ClaimantJudgment for the Claimant; the court ordered the closure of the bond account and the return of the funds to the claimant (assumed USD, as the bond amount was deposited in USD).
3	Transpac Investments Ltd v TIH Ltd: Security for Costs Application in Cross-Border Dispute 28 Apr 2024 Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant)Lost	28 Apr 2024	Transpac Investments Limited (Claimant): Application for further security for costs grantedTranspac Investments Limited must provide security for costs in favour of TIH in the sum claimed ie, $500,000 by 15 May 2024 by way of a solicitor’s undertaking or otherwise in a form reasonably satisfactory to TIH. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.