Foo Li Chuan Arlene

Foo Li Chuan Arlene is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2016. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in injunctions and legal malpractice. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Freezing Order	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Wills	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Professional Conduct Rules	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Concession Agreements	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Foo Li Chuan Arlene has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Foo Li Chuan Arlene has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Advocatus Law LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Foo v Tuang: Family Probate Dispute Over Estate Administration(Nov 2016) Cheng William v Allister Lim: Negligence Claim Over Shophouse Lease Misrepresentation(Mar 2015) STX Corp v Jason Surjana Tanuwidjaja: Contempt of Court for Non-Disclosure of Assets(Mar 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Foo Li Chuan Arlene's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25%
Won	33.8 parties avg	3.8	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2016	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Foo Li Chuan Arlene's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(25%)	25%
Won	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	78,651.18	26,217.063 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Foo v Tuang: Family Probate Dispute Over Estate Administration 27 Nov 2016 TJH Law Corporation (Defendant)Won	27 Nov 2016	TJH Law Corporation (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantClaims against TJH Law Corporation were dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, assuming SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Cheng William v Allister Lim: Negligence Claim Over Shophouse Lease Misrepresentation 15 Mar 2015 Allister Lim & Thrumurgan (Respondent, Appellant)Partial	15 Mar 2015	Allister Lim & Thrumurgan (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAllister Lim & Thrumurgan were found liable for 30% of the damages, amounting to $78,651.18 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	STX Corp v Jason Surjana Tanuwidjaja: Contempt of Court for Non-Disclosure of Assets 12 Mar 2014 STX Corp (Plaintiff)Won	12 Mar 2014	STX Corp (Plaintiff): Contempt of court found against defendantsDefendants were found in contempt of court and ordered to pay the plaintiff's costs of the contempt proceedings on the indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Maldives Airports v GMR Malé: Interim Injunction & Concession Agreement Dispute 12 Feb 2013 Republic of the Maldives (Appellant)Won	12 Feb 2013	Republic of the Maldives (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed and the injunction was set aside.