Francis SC

Francis SC is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in constitutional law and administrative law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Francis SC has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and constitutional law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Discovery of documents	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Freedom of speech	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Leave	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Francis SC has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Francis SC has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	67% of cases	Gobi a/l Avedian v Attorney-General: Judicial Review & Equal Protection of Law(Feb 2020) Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Application for Discovery of Documents in Judicial Review Proceedings(Sep 2019)
Attorney-General’s Chambers (Criminal Justice Division)	1 cases	33% of cases	AG v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Freedom of Speech & Contempt of Court(Oct 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Francis SC's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.7 parties avg	2.7	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Francis SC's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Gobi a/l Avedian v Attorney-General: Judicial Review & Equal Protection of Law 12 Feb 2020 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2020	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantApplications dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General.
2	Pannir Selvam v Attorney-General: Application for Discovery of Documents in Judicial Review Proceedings 16 Sep 2019 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	16 Sep 2019	Attorney-General (Respondent): Application DismissedApplication for discovery and leave to serve interrogatories dismissed.
3	AG v Wham Kwok Han Jolovan: Freedom of Speech & Contempt of Court 08 Oct 2018 The Attorney-General (Applicant)Won	08 Oct 2018	The Attorney-General (Applicant): Judgment for ApplicantThe Attorney-General's application for an order of committal for contempt of court was successful.