G Dinagaran

G Dinagaran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2009. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in drug trafficking and misuse of drugs act.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

G Dinagaran has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in drug trafficking and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trade names	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Undertaking	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Diplomatic Relations	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice1% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Stakeholder Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	G Dinagaran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

G Dinagaran has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Thomas Tham & Co	2 cases	50% of cases	Ramis a/l Muniandy v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis & Proof of Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act(Aug 2001) Public Prosecutor v Ramis A/L Muniandy: Drug Trafficking - Cannabis(Feb 2001)
UniLegal LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Law Society of Singapore v Tham Kok Leong Thomas: Solicitor Breaching Stakeholder Undertaking and Making Misleading Statements(Dec 2005)
Thomas Tham Dinagaran & Company	1 cases	25% of cases	Chai Chyau Ling v Racing Technology: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off(May 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of G Dinagaran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of G Dinagaran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	2,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chai Chyau Ling v Racing Technology: Trade Mark Infringement & Passing Off 03 May 2009 Racing Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	03 May 2009	Racing Technology Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $4,000 inclusive of disbursements, to be paid to the Respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Law Society of Singapore v Tham Kok Leong Thomas: Solicitor Breaching Stakeholder Undertaking and Making Misleading Statements 22 Dec 2005 Tham Kok Leong Thomas (Respondent)Lost	22 Dec 2005	Tham Kok Leong Thomas (Respondent): Suspended from practice for two yearsThe respondent was suspended from practice for a period of two years and ordered to pay the costs of the Law Society in the entire disciplinary proceedings.
3	Ramis a/l Muniandy v Public Prosecutor: Trafficking of Cannabis & Proof of Possession under Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Aug 2001 Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant)Lost	02 Aug 2001	Ramis a/l Muniandy (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
4	Public Prosecutor v Ramis A/L Muniandy: Drug Trafficking - Cannabis 22 Feb 2001 Ramis a/l Muniandy (Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2001	Ramis a/l Muniandy (Defendant): Sentenced to deathThe accused was sentenced to death.