G Kiran

G Kiran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in striking out applications and restructuring and dissolution. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 71% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

G Kiran has demonstrated expertise across 36 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and commercial disputes.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Striking Out Applications	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conditions to be imposed	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Kiran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

G Kiran has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	6 cases	86% of cases	Hong Kah Ing v Tee Kim Leng: Striking Out Pleadings and Security for Costs in Breach of Contract Claim(Dec 2024) TrueCoin LLC v Techteryx, Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute(Nov 2024) Tee Kim Leng v Hong Kah Ing: Breach of Contract & Summary Judgment(Nov 2024)
Cell Turbo Services Pte Ltd	1 cases	14% of cases	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims(Mar 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of G Kiran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 5 (71%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.5 parties avg	5.5	29%
Neutral	210.5 parties avg	10.5	29%
Partial	25.0 parties avg	5.0	29%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	113.0 parties avg	13.0
2023	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2024	55.2 parties avg	5.2

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of G Kiran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Neutral	2(29%)	29%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	57,220.00	8,174.297 cases	7

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	5 2111	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 1 cases (20.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hong Kah Ing v Tee Kim Leng: Striking Out Pleadings and Security for Costs in Breach of Contract Claim 12 Dec 2024 Hong Kah Ing (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	12 Dec 2024	Hong Kah Ing (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal dismissedAppeal against the decision to dismiss the applications to strike out the plaintiffs' statement of claim and for security for costs was dismissed. Costs of the appeal are awarded to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	TrueCoin LLC v Techteryx, Ltd: Anti-Suit Injunction & Arbitration Agreement Dispute 28 Nov 2024 TrueCoin LLC (Applicant)Won	28 Nov 2024	TrueCoin LLC (Applicant): Anti-suit injunction grantedAnti-suit injunction granted restraining Techteryx from continuing to pursue the Hong Kong action against TrueCoin. Costs of $20,000 plus $12,000 in disbursements for TrueCoin’s Delaware law expert opinion, costs of $2,000 for HC/SUM 1035/2024, and reasonable disbursements for the above matters (other than for TrueCoin’s Delaware law expert opinion) to be fixed by the court if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Tee Kim Leng v Hong Kah Ing: Breach of Contract & Summary Judgment 17 Nov 2024 Hong Kah Ing (Defendant)Neutral	17 Nov 2024	Hong Kah Ing (Defendant): Application dismissedDefendant's application to strike out claims and for security of costs was dismissed; costs of $2,800.00 to be paid to the plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Axis Megalink v Far East Mining: Unilateral Mistake, Misrepresentation & Reverse Takeover 09 May 2024 Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	09 May 2024	Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Damages AwardedDamages awarded for fraudulent misrepresentation in the amount of $10,210 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Axis Megalink v Far East Mining: Stay of Execution Pending Appeal 21 Feb 2024 Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	21 Feb 2024	Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Conditional Stay GrantedConditional stay of execution granted, pending appeal.
6	Axis Megalink v Far East Mining: Unilateral Mistake & Misrepresentation in Reverse Takeover 30 Aug 2023 Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim)Partial	30 Aug 2023	Far East Mining Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff in Counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff in CounterclaimJudgment for Far East Mining on counterclaim against Mr. Lee and Axis for S$10,210 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore) in damages for fraudulent misrepresentation.
7	Re Ocean Tankers: Judicial Management Expenses & Priority of Claims 13 Mar 2022 Cell Turbo Services Pte Ltd (Other)Neutral	13 Mar 2022	Cell Turbo Services Pte Ltd (Other): NeutralCell Turbo Services Pte Ltd was on watching brief. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.