G Prasanna Devi

G Prasanna Devi is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and employers’ duties. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated expertise across 29 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and automobile accidents.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Causation	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employer's Liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Principles governing extension of time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employers’ duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Workplace accident	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	G Prasanna Devi has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

G Prasanna Devi has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Hoh & Partners	2 cases	50% of cases	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute(Feb 2003) Sim Lee Keng Cindy v Paul Bayliss Brown: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Third Party Liability(Nov 2002)
Hoh Law Corporation	1 cases	25% of cases	Poh Kwee Eng v Hua Goi Co.: Employer's Duty of Care and Statutory Obligations under Factories Act(Dec 2006)
Undisclosed	1 cases	25% of cases	Mah Chee Kok v Cheng Chee Kim: Personal Injury Claim for Construction Foreman(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of G Prasanna Devi's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	42.8 parties avg	2.8	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2003	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of G Prasanna Devi's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	124,292.70	41,430.903 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Poh Kwee Eng v Hua Goi Co.: Employer's Duty of Care and Statutory Obligations under Factories Act 20 Dec 2006 Poh Kwee Eng (Plaintiff)Won	20 Dec 2006	Poh Kwee Eng (Plaintiff): Interlocutory JudgmentInterlocutory judgment for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
2	Mah Chee Kok v Cheng Chee Kim: Personal Injury Claim for Construction Foreman 12 Nov 2003 Mah Chee Kok (Plaintiff)Won	12 Nov 2003	Mah Chee Kok (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffTotal award of $124,292.70 plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Hua Sheng Tao v Welltech Construction: Leave to Appeal & Amount in Dispute 23 Feb 2003 Hua Sheng Tao (Plaintiff)Won	23 Feb 2003	Hua Sheng Tao (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedPlaintiff does not require leave to appeal and that his Notice of Appeal filed on 10 September 2002 be proceeded with. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Sim Lee Keng Cindy v Paul Bayliss Brown: Negligence, Motor Vehicle Accident, Third Party Liability 17 Nov 2002 Sim Lee Keng Cindy (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2002	Sim Lee Keng Cindy (Plaintiff): Interlocutory Judgment AwardedInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff against the defendant with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).