Gadriel Tan

Gadriel Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and contempt of court. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 80% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gadriel Tan has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Worksite Safety	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Crane Operation Safety	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Service Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency and Distributorships	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agents and Brokers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Defects	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gadriel Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gadriel Tan has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Morgan Lewis Stamford LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Ho Seow Wan v Ho Poey Wee: Contempt of Court for Breaching Court Order(Nov 2015) Ho Seow Wan v Ho Poey Wee: Contempt of Court for Breaching Order in Minority Oppression Suit(Sep 2015)
Inca Law LLC	2 cases	40% of cases	Moh Seng Cranes v Hup Hin: Crane Damage Due to Worksite Negligence(Dec 2012) Lim Suat Hua v Singapore HealthPartners: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Dispute(Mar 2012)
Stamford Law Corporation	1 cases	20% of cases	Jurong Primewide v Moh Seng Cranes: Negligence, Worksite Safety & Crane Collapse(Jan 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gadriel Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 4 (80%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	20%
Partial	23.0 parties avg	3.0	40%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gadriel Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(20%)	20%
Partial	2(40%)	40%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	23,884.22	7,961.413 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ho Seow Wan v Ho Poey Wee: Contempt of Court for Breaching Court Order 24 Nov 2015 Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff)Won	24 Nov 2015	Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff): Successful in committal applicationDefendants found guilty of contempt and fined; plaintiff awarded 90% of costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Ho Seow Wan v Ho Poey Wee: Contempt of Court for Breaching Order in Minority Oppression Suit 06 Sep 2015 Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff)Won	06 Sep 2015	Ho Seow Wan (Plaintiff): Successful in applicationPlaintiff's application for an order for committal of the defendants for contempt of court was successful.
3	Jurong Primewide v Moh Seng Cranes: Negligence, Worksite Safety & Crane Collapse 20 Jan 2014 Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	20 Jan 2014	Jurong Primewide Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartLiability re-apportioned with MA Builders; 60% liability assigned to Jurong Primewide.
4	Moh Seng Cranes v Hup Hin: Crane Damage Due to Worksite Negligence 10 Dec 2012 Jurong Prime Wide Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Dec 2012	Jurong Prime Wide Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the second defendant; the Plaintiff’s costs shall be agreed or taxed and borne by the second defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lim Suat Hua v Singapore HealthPartners: Breach of Contract & Fiduciary Duty Dispute 20 Mar 2012 Lim Suat Hua (Plaintiff)Partial	20 Mar 2012	Lim Suat Hua (Plaintiff): Claim allowed in partClaim allowed in part in the sum of $23,884.22, together with interest at the rate of 5.33% from the date of the termination of Lim’s Service Agreement (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).