Gan Guo Wei

Gan Guo Wei is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in medical malpractice and negligence. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in medical malpractice and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Medical Malpractice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Medical profession and practice	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional Misconduct	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Informed consent	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Pulmonary Fat Embolism	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Liposuction Complications	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gan Guo Wei has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gan Guo Wei has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Charles Lin LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure(Nov 2020) Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records(Jan 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gan Guo Wei's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gan Guo Wei's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,599,557.48	5,599,557.481 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seto Wei Meng v Foo Chee Boon Edward: Negligence in Liposuction and Fat Transfer Procedure 25 Nov 2020 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant)Lost	25 Nov 2020	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded in the amount of $5,599,557.48 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Foo Chee Boon Edward v Singapore Medical Council: Appeal Against Suspension for Inadequate Medical Records 30 Jan 2020 Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant)Won	30 Jan 2020	Foo Chee Boon Edward (Appellant): Appeal AllowedConviction and sentence set aside.