Gary Leonard Low

Gary Leonard Low is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in jurisdiction and prevention of corruption act. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 40% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated expertise across 54 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	5 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	4 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forum Non Conveniens	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service of document out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful arrest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Caveats	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Full and Frank Disclosure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right of first refusal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formalities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Private Investigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Lodgment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assault	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Forgery	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Leonard Low has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gary Leonard Low has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	10 cases	100% of cases	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition(Jan 2025) Chang Peng Hong Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Multiple Penalties Under Prevention of Corruption Act(Dec 2024) Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gary Leonard Low's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 4 (40%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.8 parties avg	3.8	30%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	10%
Won	62.9 parties avg	2.9	60%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gary Leonard Low's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(30%)	30%
Neutral	1(10%)	10%
Won	6(60%)	60%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,877,595.00	1,469,398.754 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Vibrant Group v Tong Chi Ho: Deceit Claim over Blackgold Australia Acquisition 26 Jan 2025 Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	26 Jan 2025	Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant): No judgment enteredFindex successfully set aside the order granting Vibrant leave to serve its Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim (Amendment No 1) on Findex in Australia.
2	Chang Peng Hong Clarence v Public Prosecutor: Multiple Penalties Under Prevention of Corruption Act 03 Dec 2024 Chang Peng Hong Clarence (Applicant)Lost	03 Dec 2024	Chang Peng Hong Clarence (Applicant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, and the applicant's in-default imprisonment term was recalibrated upwards to 120 months. The applicant is required to pay a penalty of $5,877,595 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Vibrant Group Ltd v Tong Chi Ho: Jurisdiction & Forum Non Conveniens in Fraudulent Misrepresentation Claim 11 Oct 2022 Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2022	Findex (Aust) Pty Ltd (Defendant): Service out of jurisdiction order set asideService out of jurisdiction order in respect of the third defendant was set aside.
4	Wang Fumin v Citibank: Negligence, Misrepresentation & Banking Advice 11 May 2022 Citibank Singapore Ltd (Defendant)Won	11 May 2022	Citibank Singapore Ltd (Defendant): Claims dismissedThe plaintiff's claims against the defendant were dismissed.
5	Bunge SA v Shrikant Bhasi: Jurisdiction, Forum Non Conveniens & Contractual Interpretation 29 Sep 2020 State Bank of India (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	29 Sep 2020	State Bank of India (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; claims to be heard in Singapore (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ochroid Trading v Chua Siok Lui: Unenforceability of Loan Agreements due to Illegal Moneylending 21 Mar 2017 Ole Prytz Rasmussen (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Mar 2017	Ole Prytz Rasmussen (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, fraudulent misrepresentation and conspiracy to defraud was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Telemedia v Credit Agricole: Breach of Mandate & Duty of Care in Share Transfer Dispute 17 Nov 2014 Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant)Won	17 Nov 2014	Credit Agricole (Suisse) SA (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was given in favor of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
8	Simon Suppiah Sunmugam v Chua Geok Teck: Claim for Assault and Wrongful Arrest 04 Apr 2012 Another (Defendant)Won	04 Apr 2012	Another (Defendant): Judgment in favor of DefendantThe court found that the defendant's actions were justified and dismissed the plaintiff's claim.
9	Ho Seek Yueng Novel v J & V Development: Oral Loan & Right of First Refusal Dispute 17 Apr 2006 J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	17 Apr 2006	J & V Development Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment was granted in favor of the defendant.
10	Elis Tjoa v United Overseas Bank: Forgery, Bank's Duty of Care & Contractual Terms 01 Jan 2003 United Overseas Bank (Defendant)Won	01 Jan 2003	United Overseas Bank (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; plaintiff's claim dismissed with costs to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.