Gary Low Wee Chong

Gary Low Wee Chong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2013 to 2013. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in fiduciary duties and disclosure of documents. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in employment contracts and fiduciary duties.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Employment Contracts	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Electronic Discovery	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Cloud Computing	1 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gary Low Wee Chong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gary Low Wee Chong has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	100% of cases	Dirak Asia v Chew Hua Kok: Electronic Discovery, Cloud Computing & Power Over Documents(Jan 2013)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gary Low Wee Chong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gary Low Wee Chong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Dirak Asia v Chew Hua Kok: Electronic Discovery, Cloud Computing & Power Over Documents 08 Jan 2013 Suzhou Dirak (Plaintiff)Won	08 Jan 2013	Suzhou Dirak (Plaintiff): Application AllowedApplication for discovery of emails allowed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).