Genesa Tan

Genesa Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and fraud and deceit. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Genesa Tan has demonstrated expertise across 16 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and banking law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Attachment of Debts	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Genesa Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Genesa Tan has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tembusu Law LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Wong Tian Jun De Beers v Public Prosecutor: Cheating for Sex & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing(Nov 2021)
Focus Law Asia LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Mitsui E&S Power Systems Inc v Neptun International: Attachment of Debts Despite CAD Order(Feb 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Genesa Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	14.0 parties avg	4.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Genesa Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Partial	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mitsui E&S Power Systems Inc v Neptun International: Attachment of Debts Despite CAD Order 15 Feb 2024 Mitsui E&S Power Systems Inc (Claimant)Partial	15 Feb 2024	Mitsui E&S Power Systems Inc (Claimant): Monies in account remain attachedApplication to release the attached debt was dismissed. The monies in the account remain attached, subject to conditions regarding the CAD order and any disposal inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Tian Jun De Beers v Public Prosecutor: Cheating for Sex & Criminal Intimidation Sentencing 30 Nov 2021 Wong Tian Jun De Beers (Appellant)Lost	30 Nov 2021	Wong Tian Jun De Beers (Appellant): Appeal Dismissed, Sentence EnhancedThe appellant's appeal was dismissed, and the sentence was enhanced to eight years and five months' imprisonment and a fine of S$20,000 (in default one month’s imprisonment).