Gerald Koh

Gerald Koh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2012. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in patents and intellectual property law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Koh has demonstrated expertise across 23 primary practice areas, with significant experience in patents and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Patents	3 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Computers and Software	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Acquiescence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Infringement	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Pharmaceutical Patents	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Patent Validity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Novelty	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Inventive step	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Car Park Systems	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR) Technology	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Cashless Payment Systems	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Sufficiency of Disclosure	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Koh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Koh has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier	3 cases	75% of cases	Stratech Systems v Guthrie Properties: Breach of Confidence & Passing Off in Car Park System(Apr 2001) Genelabs v Institut Pasteur: HIV-2 Patent Validity & Infringement(Nov 2000) Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute(Mar 2000)
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit(Jan 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Koh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.1
Complex Cases: 1 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	43.1 parties avg	3.1	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Koh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	AstraZeneca AB v Ranbaxy: Striking Out Defence and Counterclaim in Patent Infringement Suit 12 Jan 2012 Astrazeneca AB (Plaintiff)Won	12 Jan 2012	Astrazeneca AB (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication to strike out certain references and paragraphs in the Defence and Counterclaim granted. No monetary amount awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Stratech Systems v Guthrie Properties: Breach of Confidence & Passing Off in Car Park System 19 Apr 2001 Mall Management Pte Ltd (formerly known as Guthrie M & E Consultancy Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	19 Apr 2001	Mall Management Pte Ltd (formerly known as Guthrie M & E Consultancy Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claims were dismissed.
3	Genelabs v Institut Pasteur: HIV-2 Patent Validity & Infringement 01 Nov 2000 Another (Respondent)Won	01 Nov 2000	Another (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe appeal was dismissed with costs and with the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Institut Pasteur v Genelabs: HIV-2 Patent Infringement & Validity Dispute 30 Mar 2000 Pasteur Sanofi Diagnostics (Plaintiff)Won	30 Mar 2000	Pasteur Sanofi Diagnostics (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; monetary amount is 0.00 as the amount will be determined during assessment of damages. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.