Gerald Martin Wee

Gerald Martin Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2004. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in automobile accidents and breach of contract. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Double Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Collateral Benefits	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Rules of construction	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sales Representative Agreement	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contextual approach	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Martin Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Martin Wee has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Bogaars & Din	2 cases	67% of cases	Cain Sales v Beyonics: Commission Dispute over Seagate Contract Manufacturing(Jul 2003) Public Prosecutor v Wong Siu Fai: Sentencing for Sexual Offences Against a Minor(May 2002)
Bogaars and Din	1 cases	33% of cases	Lo Lee Len v Grand Interior Renovation: Negligence, Damages & Double Recovery(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Martin Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.0 parties avg	4.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Martin Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lo Lee Len v Grand Interior Renovation: Negligence, Damages & Double Recovery 09 Feb 2004 Chew Kiat Keong (Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2004	Chew Kiat Keong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
2	Cain Sales v Beyonics: Commission Dispute over Seagate Contract Manufacturing 27 Jul 2003 Cain Sales & Consultancy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	27 Jul 2003	Cain Sales & Consultancy Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for commission was dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Public Prosecutor v Wong Siu Fai: Sentencing for Sexual Offences Against a Minor 15 May 2002 Wong Siu Fai (Defendant)Lost	15 May 2002	Wong Siu Fai (Defendant): Conviction and ImprisonmentSentenced to one day's imprisonment for the first charge and six years' imprisonment for the second charge, to run concurrently.