Gerald Ng

Gerald Ng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice. Their track record shows a 67.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Ng has demonstrated expertise across 8 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and jurisdiction.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	3 cases	20% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	20% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 20% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Ng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Ng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	67% of cases	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung: Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal on Arbitration Clause(Sep 2003) Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court(Aug 2003)
Wong and Leow LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings(Dec 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Ng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	67%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	34.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Ng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33%)	33%
Won	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,000.00	2,500.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Samsung Corp v Chinese Chamber Realty: Summary Judgment & Stay of Proceedings 28 Dec 2003 Samsung Corp (Appellant)Won	28 Dec 2003	Samsung Corp (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; no application for summary judgement should be brought before the stay application has been finally disposed of. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung: Stay of Proceedings Pending Appeal on Arbitration Clause 21 Sep 2003 Samsung Corp (No 2) (Defendant, Appellant)Won	21 Sep 2003	Samsung Corp (No 2) (Defendant, Appellant): Stay of Orders GrantedOrders of Rajendran J stayed pending appeal before the Court of Appeal.
3	Chinese Chamber Realty v Samsung Corp: Summary Judgment & Arbitration Stay Under Rules of Court 14 Aug 2003 Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	14 Aug 2003	Samsung Corp (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedSamsung's appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay $5,000 in costs to CCR (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).