Gerald Paul Seah

Gerald Paul Seah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2019 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in equitable compensation and injunctions. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and asset recovery.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	2 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Equitable Compensation	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Natural forum	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Restraint of foreign proceedings	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Comity	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Vexatious and oppressive conduct	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty of Care	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Expert evidence	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Paul Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Paul Seah has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation(Jul 2024)
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC	1 cases	50% of cases	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute(Jul 2019)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Paul Seah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.5
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	50%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2019	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Paul Seah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	96,300.00	96,300.001 cases	1
USD	3,713,650,000.00	3,713,650,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Credit Suisse Trust Ltd v Ivanishvili: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Equitable Compensation 04 Jul 2024 Bera Ivanishvili (Respondent)Partial	04 Jul 2024	Bera Ivanishvili (Respondent): Appeal Partially DismissedThe respondents were successful in defending the appeal on the key points, with the court upholding the finding of breach of fiduciary duty and the use of the Whole Portfolio Model for quantification. The compensation award of US$742.73m was adjusted, but the respondents remained the more successful party. Assumed USD, as the judgment involves US dollar amounts and the underlying transactions were denominated in US dollars.
2	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Jhaveri Darsan Jitendra: Anti-Suit Injunction & Natural Forum Dispute 25 Jul 2019 Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Appellant, Plaintiff)Won	25 Jul 2019	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the respondent to pay the appellant the costs of the appeal and the two applications for leave to adduce fresh evidence in the appeal, fixed at $60,000 inclusive of disbursements. The respondent shall also bear the costs below fixed at $36,300 inclusive of disbursements. The usual consequential orders will apply. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.