Gerald Tay

Gerald Tay is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2020. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trust law. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerald Tay has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in fiduciary duties and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	13% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Financial Services	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Investment Law	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerald Tay has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerald Tay has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights(Apr 2020) Asia-American Investments Group Inc v UBS AG: Breach of Contract & Warranty of Authority(Jun 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerald Tay's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	23.3 parties avg	3.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerald Tay's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	2(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
CHF	9,500,000.00	9,500,000.001 cases	1
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Baker v BCS: Oral Trust, Fiduciary Duty & Loan Dispute over Ethocyn Rights 28 Apr 2020 Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff)Won	28 Apr 2020	Baker, Michael A (executor of the estate of Chantal Burnison, deceased) (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment in favour of Baker, on behalf of the Estate, against Weber in the sum of CHF9.5 million plus interest at the rate of 3% per annum to the plaintiff, calculated from the date of the loan to the date of judgment; thereafter, for the avoidance of doubt, interest at 5.33% per annum shall run pursuant to para 77 of the Supreme Court Practice Directions.
2	Asia-American Investments Group Inc v UBS AG: Breach of Contract & Warranty of Authority 14 Jun 2017 Amy Tee (Defendant)Won	14 Jun 2017	Amy Tee (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant.