Gerard Quek

Gerard Quek is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in judicial management and torts. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 75% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gerard Quek has demonstrated expertise across 27 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gerard Quek has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gerard Quek has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PDLegal LLC	3 cases	75% of cases	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute(Sep 2024) Hon G v Tan Pei Li: Application for Permission to Appeal Decision on Counterfeit Luxury Watches(Jul 2023) Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform(Aug 2022)
PD Legal LLC	1 cases	25% of cases	Grendus v Lynch: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Investment(Aug 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gerard Quek's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 3 (75%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	34.3 parties avg	4.3	75%
Neutral	16.0 parties avg	6.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gerard Quek's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Neutral	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute 03 Sep 2024 Ng Chee Seng (Claimant)Lost	03 Sep 2024	Ng Chee Seng (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; appeal not allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Hon G v Tan Pei Li: Application for Permission to Appeal Decision on Counterfeit Luxury Watches 18 Jul 2023 Hon G (Applicant)Lost	18 Jul 2023	Hon G (Applicant): Application dismissedApplication for permission to appeal was dismissed.
3	Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform 30 Aug 2022 Kong Xie Shern (Other)Neutral	30 Aug 2022	Kong Xie Shern (Other): NeutralKong Xie Shern was mentioned as a non-party.
4	Grendus v Lynch: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Conspiracy in Investment 16 Aug 2021 Jason Grendus (Plaintiff)Lost	16 Aug 2021	Jason Grendus (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim against Mr. Dawkins and Aryan Search dismissed.