Germaine Chia

Germaine Chia is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2009 to 2015. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and breach of contract. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Germaine Chia has demonstrated expertise across 14 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Distributorship Agreement	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Rules of natural justice	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Termination of Employment Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Germaine Chia has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Germaine Chia has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Stamford Law Corporation	2 cases	67% of cases	Fact 2006 Pte Ltd v First Alverstone Capital Ltd: Agency Law & Contractual Interpretation(Jan 2015) Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations(Aug 2012)
Wong & Leow LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Sobati General Trading LLC v PT Multistrada Arahsarana: Dispute over Distributorship Agreement Termination(Oct 2009)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Germaine Chia's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	32.3 parties avg	2.3	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Germaine Chia's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	19,000.00	6,333.333 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Fact 2006 Pte Ltd v First Alverstone Capital Ltd: Agency Law & Contractual Interpretation 29 Jan 2015 Fact 2006 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jan 2015	Fact 2006 Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to strike out claim rejectedApplication to strike out the claim was rejected; costs of $4,000 awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Monié v APRIL Management: Interpretation of Employment Agreement & Accrued Obligations 06 Aug 2012 Alain Monié (Plaintiff)Won	06 Aug 2012	Alain Monié (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe plaintiff was entitled to be paid by the defendant the six sums set out in Appendix B to the Agreement on the dates prescribed therein commencing on 2 March 2012 and ending on 1 April 2013. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff interest on any late payment of any of the sums from the date each is due to the date of payment at the usual rate. The defendant is also ordered to pay the plaintiff costs, to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Sobati General Trading LLC v PT Multistrada Arahsarana: Dispute over Distributorship Agreement Termination 27 Oct 2009 PT Multistrada Arahsarana (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Oct 2009	PT Multistrada Arahsarana (Respondent, Defendant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed. SGT was ordered to pay Multistrada S$15,000 costs (excluding disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.