Germaine Tan

Germaine Tan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2011 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contract law and employment law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Germaine Tan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice18% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Joint Venture Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction of Workover Pulling Unit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Charter Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Oil and Gas Industry	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture Provision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Non-Compete Agreement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Germaine Tan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Germaine Tan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rodyk & Davidson LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses(Feb 2014) BR Energy v KS Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement for WPU Construction(Mar 2013) Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Restraint of Trade & Forfeiture of Employee Benefits(Aug 2012)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Germaine Tan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Germaine Tan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	KS Energy v BR Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement & Endeavours Clauses 25 Feb 2014 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent)Lost	25 Feb 2014	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; BRE's claim against KSE was unsuccessful. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	BR Energy v KS Energy: Breach of Joint Venture Agreement for WPU Construction 19 Mar 2013 BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	19 Mar 2013	BR Energy (M) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff on liabilityJudgment in favour of BRE on liability with costs. BRE's claim for damages is to be assessed by the Registrar. The question of interest, if any, is also reserved to the Registrar. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Restraint of Trade & Forfeiture of Employee Benefits 06 Aug 2012 Mano Vikrant Singh (Appellant)Won	06 Aug 2012	Mano Vikrant Singh (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
4	Mano Vikrant Singh v Cargill: Enforceability of Forfeiture Provision in Incentive Plan 07 Nov 2011 Mano Vikrant Singh (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Nov 2011	Mano Vikrant Singh (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for a declaration that the forfeiture provision is void and for payment of US$1,741,894 in deferred incentive payments was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.