Germaine Teo

Germaine Teo is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in director's duties and costs. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Germaine Teo has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in appellate practice and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Appellate Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Henderson v Henderson doctrine	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Germaine Teo has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Germaine Teo has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	2 cases	100% of cases	Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Abuse of Process, Director's Duties, & Henderson Doctrine(Jun 2021) Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Appeal Leave Application on Trial Costs Order(Sep 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Germaine Teo's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 7.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	17.0 parties avg	7.0	50%
Partial	27.0 parties avg	7.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	17.0 parties avg	7.0
2021	17.0 parties avg	7.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Germaine Teo's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(33%)	33%
Partial	2(67%)	67%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Abuse of Process, Director's Duties, & Henderson Doctrine 01 Jun 2021 Beyonics Precision (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Dismissed	01 Jun 2021	Beyonics Precision (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaims dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Beyonics v Goh Chan Peng: Appeal Leave Application on Trial Costs Order 29 Sep 2020 Beyonics Precision (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Partial	29 Sep 2020	Beyonics Precision (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Leave to appeal grantedLeave to appeal against the judgment on costs granted out of time.