Gill Amarick Singh

Gill Amarick Singh is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2017 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and sentencing. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and sentencing.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	6 cases	17% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	5 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	3 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Murder	2 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Cumulative Scald Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gill Amarick Singh has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gill Amarick Singh has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Amarick Gill LLC	6 cases	100% of cases	PP v Azlin & Ridzuan: Murder Sentencing Appeal for Child Scalding Case(Oct 2022) Amarjeet Singh v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion, Plea Agreements & Court Jurisdiction(Mar 2021) Public Prosecutor v Salzawiyah, Shisham, Jumadi: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gill Amarick Singh's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 2 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	43.5 parties avg	3.5	67%
Neutral	13.0 parties avg	3.0	17%
Withdrawn	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gill Amarick Singh's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(67%)	67%
Neutral	1(17%)	17%
Withdrawn	1(17%)	17%

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Withdrawn: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Azlin & Ridzuan: Murder Sentencing Appeal for Child Scalding Case 17 Oct 2022 Azlin Binte Arujunah (Respondent)Lost	17 Oct 2022	Azlin Binte Arujunah (Respondent): Life ImprisonmentAzlin was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder under s 300(c) of the Penal Code.
2	Amarjeet Singh v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Motion, Plea Agreements & Court Jurisdiction 29 Mar 2021 Amarjeet Singh (Applicant)Withdrawn	29 Mar 2021	Amarjeet Singh (Applicant): Application WithdrawnThe applicant withdrew the criminal motion after the court raised concerns about its jurisdictional basis.
3	Public Prosecutor v Salzawiyah, Shisham, Jumadi: Trafficking Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 25 Jan 2021 Salzawiyah Binte Latib (Defendant)Lost	25 Jan 2021	Salzawiyah Binte Latib (Defendant): GuiltyFound guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.
4	PP v Zulkarnain: Misuse of Drugs Act Trafficking & Abetment Case 15 Jul 2018 Mohammad Rizwan bin Akbar Husain (Defendant)Lost	15 Jul 2018	Mohammad Rizwan bin Akbar Husain (Defendant): Convicted; sentenced to deathRizwan was convicted of abetting Zulkarnain to be in possession of drugs for the purpose of trafficking and received the mandatory death sentence.
5	Public Prosecutor v Alagesan Nathan: Drug Trafficking - Mandatory Minimum Sentence 02 Apr 2017 Chidananda Vijakumaran (Defendant)Lost	02 Apr 2017	Chidananda Vijakumaran (Defendant): Mandatory minimum sentence imposedChidananda Vijakumaran was sentenced to 20 years’ imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
6	Micheal Anak Garing v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction and Sentencing Appeal 26 Feb 2017 TONY ANAK IMBA (Respondent)Neutral	26 Feb 2017	TONY ANAK IMBA (Respondent): Sentence UpheldSentence of life imprisonment and caning upheld.