Gitta Priska Adelya

Gitta Priska Adelya is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2023 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil procedure and service out of jurisdiction. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated expertise across 44 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice39% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Litigation Funding	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Burden of proof	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Double Rent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Auditing Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Financial Reporting Standards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Reasonable Skill and Care	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Right to Forfeiture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Tenant’s Covenants	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Holding Over	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Accountants Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Security for Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gitta Priska Adelya has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gitta Priska Adelya has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	8 cases	100% of cases	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal(Sep 2024) Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action(Jul 2024) Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Forfeiture, Lease Termination & Holding Over Dispute(May 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gitta Priska Adelya's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.9
Complex Cases: 8 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Won	55.4 parties avg	5.4	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	45.3 parties avg	5.3
2024	44.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gitta Priska Adelya's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(25%)	25%
Neutral	1(13%)	13%
Won	5(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	1,600.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2024	4 13	Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Striking Out Notice of Appeal 25 Sep 2024 Marchmont Pte Ltd (Appellant, Claimant)Won	25 Sep 2024	Marchmont Pte Ltd (Appellant, Claimant): Application to strike out the Notice of Appeal dismissed with costs.Application to strike out the Notice of Appeal dismissed with costs fixed at $8,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore), inclusive of disbursements, on a standard basis.
2	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Striking Out Pleadings for Failure to Disclose Reasonable Cause of Action 09 Jul 2024 Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff)Neutral	09 Jul 2024	Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff): Application to strike out parts of Statement of Claim dismissedThe defendant's application to strike out parts of the Statement of Claim was dismissed.
3	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Forfeiture, Lease Termination & Holding Over Dispute 01 May 2024 Marchmont Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	01 May 2024	Marchmont Pte Ltd (Claimant): Judgment for the claimantJudgment for the claimant; damages to be assessed by the Registrar.
4	Luckin Coffee Inc v Interactive Digital Finance Ltd: Jurisdiction & Service Out of Singapore 04 Mar 2024 Interactive Digital Finance Limited (Respondent)Won	04 Mar 2024	Interactive Digital Finance Limited (Respondent): Application for permission to appeal dismissedLuckin's application for permission to appeal against the decision of the Judge in RA 206 was dismissed. The court ordered Luckin to pay the costs of the application fixed at $7,000, inclusive of disbursements, to the Claimants collectively, and also to Credit Suisse AG individually. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lum Ooi Lin v Hyflux Ltd: Appeal on Security for Costs & Court's Discretion 29 Nov 2023 Cosimo Borrelli (Respondent, Appellant)Won	29 Nov 2023	Cosimo Borrelli (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the court accepted the Omni Undertaking as an adequate form of security. No specific monetary amount was awarded, but costs were awarded to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Hyflux Ltd v KPMG LLP: Appeal on Particulars in Negligence, Breach of Contract, and Statutory Duty Claims 26 Sep 2023 Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff)Lost	26 Sep 2023	Tuaspring Pte Ltd (under receivership) (Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; costs reserved to the trial judge.
7	Interactive Digital Finance Ltd v Credit Suisse AG: Production of Documents under Rules of Court 2021 23 Jul 2023 Tiah Thee Kian (Claimant, Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2023	Tiah Thee Kian (Claimant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the AR's order for production of documents was dismissed. Claimants to bear their own costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Hyflux Ltd v Lum Ooi Lin: Security for Costs - Litigation Funding Undertaking 27 Apr 2023 Patrick Bance (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	27 Apr 2023	Patrick Bance (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; security for costs to be furnished by way of an undertaking to the court jointly by Omni Bridgeway Limited and Omni Bridgeway (Singapore) Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.