Glenda Lim

Glenda Lim is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and transfer of cases. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Glenda Lim has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and summary judgement.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	13% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Transfer of Cases	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bills of Exchange Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Unlawful means conspiracy	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenda Lim has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Glenda Lim has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Aequitas Law LLP	1 cases	33% of cases	Spamhaus Technology Ltd v Reputation Administration Service: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Contract Formation(Oct 2023)
Moey & Yuen	1 cases	33% of cases	Oh Bernard v Six Capital Investments Ltd: Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings in Investment Fraud Claim(Mar 2020)
Moey & Yuen LLC	1 cases	33% of cases	Autoexport & EPZ v TOW77: Transfer of Counterclaim Exceeding District Court Limit(Jan 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Glenda Lim's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	67%
Won	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Glenda Lim's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,000.00	4,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Spamhaus Technology Ltd v Reputation Administration Service: Setting Aside Default Judgment & Contract Formation 16 Oct 2023 Reputation Administration Service Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	16 Oct 2023	Reputation Administration Service Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed and Default Judgement restored. Ordered to pay costs of $4,000 to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Autoexport & EPZ v TOW77: Transfer of Counterclaim Exceeding District Court Limit 25 Jan 2021 Autoexport & EPZ Pte Ltd (formerly known as AJ Towing (S) Pte Ltd) (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	25 Jan 2021	Autoexport & EPZ Pte Ltd (formerly known as AJ Towing (S) Pte Ltd) (Applicant, Defendant): Application DismissedPrayers 1, 2 and 3 of Originating Summons No 1064 of 2020 are dismissed.
3	Oh Bernard v Six Capital Investments Ltd: Joinder of Parties and Amendment of Pleadings in Investment Fraud Claim 03 Mar 2020 Oh Bernard (Plaintiff)Won	03 Mar 2020	Oh Bernard (Plaintiff): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed, permitting the joinder of five intended parties and amendment of the statement of claim.