Glenn Chua Ze Xuan

Glenn Chua Ze Xuan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2022 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and unjust enrichment. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated expertise across 15 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil practice and litigation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Practice	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Non est factum	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice0% relevance score	Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Glenn Chua Ze Xuan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
PDLegal LLC	2 cases	100% of cases	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute(Sep 2024) Wong Leng Si Rachel v Wu Su Han Olivia: Defamation Claim over Instagram Posts and Specific Discovery Appeal(Jun 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Glenn Chua Ze Xuan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Glenn Chua Ze Xuan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ng Chee Tian v Ng Chee Pong: Unjust Enrichment, Limitation Act & Proprietary Remedies Dispute 03 Sep 2024 Ng Chee Seng (Claimant)Lost	03 Sep 2024	Ng Chee Seng (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; appeal not allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Wong Leng Si Rachel v Wu Su Han Olivia: Defamation Claim over Instagram Posts and Specific Discovery Appeal 27 Jun 2022 Wu Su Han Olivia (Respondent, Defendant)Won	27 Jun 2022	Wu Su Han Olivia (Respondent, Defendant): Discovery order upheldThe order for specific discovery against the plaintiff was upheld. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.