Glenn Seah

Glenn Seah is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2006. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and driving offences. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Glenn Seah has demonstrated expertise across 13 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	3 cases	18% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 18% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Driving offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Immigration	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Glenn Seah has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Glenn Seah has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	2 cases	50% of cases	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis(Apr 2001) Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case(Apr 2001)
Deputy Public Prosecutor	2 cases	50% of cases	Mohd Aslam v PP: Abetment of False Statement for Employment Pass - Mens Rea(Mar 2006) Kuan Cheng Poh v Public Prosecutor: Driving Offence - Driving Without Due Regard for Safety(Mar 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Glenn Seah's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	22.5 parties avg	2.5	50%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2006	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Glenn Seah's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	2(50%)	50%
Won	2(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Mohd Aslam v PP: Abetment of False Statement for Employment Pass - Mens Rea 15 Mar 2006 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	15 Mar 2006	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction upheld in partConviction for the second offence upheld.
2	Kuan Cheng Poh v Public Prosecutor: Driving Offence - Driving Without Due Regard for Safety 03 Mar 2004 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Mar 2004	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeals dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction and sentence.
3	PP v Mohamed Abdul Nasser & Ashok Kumar Giri: Trafficking of Cannabis 25 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	25 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Partial LossThe Public Prosecutor lost the case against the first accused but won the case against the second accused (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	Public Prosecutor v Solaiyan Arumugam: Rape and Molest Case 25 Apr 2001 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	25 Apr 2001	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty as charged.