Gn Chiang Soon

Gn Chiang Soon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2005. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and torts. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 83% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated expertise across 20 primary practice areas, with significant experience in property law and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Property Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Private nuisance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Rule in Rylands v Fletcher	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gn Chiang Soon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gn Chiang Soon has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Dass & Co	2 cases	33% of cases	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure(Oct 2001) Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Breach of Trust & Mortgage Dispute(Sep 2001)
Gn & Co	2 cases	33% of cases	Epolar System v Lee Hock Chuan: Nuisance Claim for Fire Damage Dismissed(Mar 2003) Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo: Oral Contract Dispute & Property Misdescription(Apr 2000)
Gn and Company	1 cases	17% of cases	Tung Hui Mannequin v Tenet Insurance: Solicitor's Authority to Act & Costs(Apr 2005)
Gn & Company	1 cases	17% of cases	Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher(Dec 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gn Chiang Soon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 10.4
Complex Cases: 5 (83%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	511.0 parties avg	11.0	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	24.7 parties avg	4.7
2001	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2003	114.0 parties avg	14.0
2005	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gn Chiang Soon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	99,991.16	49,995.582 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Tung Hui Mannequin v Tenet Insurance: Solicitor's Authority to Act & Costs 14 Apr 2005 Tung Hui Mannequin Industries (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	14 Apr 2005	Tung Hui Mannequin Industries (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeals dismissed with costsAppeals dismissed with costs of $1,500 per defendant plus reasonable disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Epolar System v Lee Hock Chuan: Nuisance Claim for Fire Damage Dismissed 20 Mar 2003 Heng Soon Koon (Appellant)Lost	20 Mar 2003	Heng Soon Koon (Appellant): Claim DismissedThe appellant's claim for damages was dismissed.
3	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Apportionment of Costs and Court's Discretion in Civil Procedure 11 Oct 2001 Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent)Lost	11 Oct 2001	Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent): Appeal deniedAppeal denied.
4	Ho Kon Kim v Lim Gek Kim Betsy: Breach of Trust & Mortgage Dispute 25 Sep 2001 Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent)Lost	25 Sep 2001	Lim Gek Kim Betsy (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed against Ms Lim. Ms Lim was found to have committed a breach of trust and is accountable to Mdm Ho for the loss she has sustained. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher 04 Dec 2000 Another (Plaintiff)Lost	04 Dec 2000	Another (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiffs' claim against the first and second defendants was dismissed.
6	Gn Muey Muey v Goh Poh Choo: Oral Contract Dispute & Property Misdescription 12 Apr 2000 Gn Muey Muey (Appellant)Won	12 Apr 2000	Gn Muey Muey (Appellant): Appeal allowedAppeal allowed; judgment for the appellant in the sum of $99,991.16 with interest at 6% per annum from the date of the issue of the writ to the date hereof. The counterclaim is dismissed.