Goh Aik Leng

Goh Aik Leng is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2003. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and unlawful assembly. Their track record shows a 17.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated expertise across 30 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	4 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	3 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Grievous Hurt	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Common object	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Drug Possession	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banker's Books	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
McKenzie Friend	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Aik Leng has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Goh Aik Leng & Partners	5 cases	83% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Discovery of Banker's Books and Relevancy in Fraud/Negligence Claim(Feb 2003) Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Right to Legal Representation for Litigants in Person(Sep 2002) Thongthot Yordsa-Art v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object & Murder(Jul 2002)
Goh Aik Leng & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Pius Gilbert Louis: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Sentencing Powers(Aug 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Aik Leng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.3
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	52.4 parties avg	2.4	83%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Aik Leng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	5(83%)	83%
Won	1(17%)	17%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Pius Gilbert Louis: Interpretation of Criminal Procedure Code on Sentencing Powers 21 Aug 2003 Pius Gilbert Louis (Respondent)Won	21 Aug 2003	Pius Gilbert Louis (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe court's decision effectively meant that the original sentence enhancement by the High Court was not valid, as it exceeded the permissible limit under the law.
2	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Discovery of Banker's Books and Relevancy in Fraud/Negligence Claim 09 Feb 2003 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Appellant)Lost	09 Feb 2003	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security for costs, together with any accrued interest, shall be released to the respondent UBS to account of its costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v UBS AG: Right to Legal Representation for Litigants in Person 15 Sep 2002 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	15 Sep 2002	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the order preventing Mr. Goh from presenting arguments on the plaintiff's behalf was dismissed.
4	Thongthot Yordsa-Art v PP: Unlawful Assembly, Common Object & Murder 09 Jul 2002 Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Appellant)Lost	09 Jul 2002	Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
5	PP v Thongthot Yordsa-Art: Unlawful Assembly & Murder under Penal Code s 149 24 Feb 2002 Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2002	Thongthot Yordsa-Art (Defendant): ConvictedThe defendant was convicted of the crime.
6	PP v Yap Ah Chuan: Trafficking of Diamorphine, Misuse of Drugs Act 06 Aug 2001 Yap Ah Chuan (Defendant)Lost	06 Aug 2001	Yap Ah Chuan (Defendant): GuiltyThe accused was found guilty of trafficking in diamorphine.