Goh Aik Leng Mark

Goh Aik Leng Mark is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2003 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in landlord and tenant law and statutory offences. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated expertise across 38 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penalties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Forfeiture of Lease	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Double Rent	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Termination of Leases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver of Right to Forfeiture	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Tenant’s Covenants	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recovery of Possession	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Holding Over	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Deed of Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leases	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreements	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Aik Leng Mark has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Aik Leng Mark has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
VanillaLaw LLC	3 cases	50% of cases	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Forfeiture, Lease Termination & Holding Over Dispute(May 2024) PP v Masui: Prevention of Corruption Act & Penalty for Accepting Gratification(Dec 2021) Toh Wee Ping Benjamin v Grande Corp: Striking Out Defence & Assessment of Damages(May 2020)
MG Chambers LLC	1 cases	17% of cases	Alvin Nicholas Nathan v Raffles Assets: Breach of Tenancy Agreement & Damages Claim(Jan 2015)
Mark Goh & Co	1 cases	17% of cases	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates(Dec 2010)
Goh Aik Leng & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore: Review of Taxation of Costs(Feb 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Aik Leng Mark's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.3
Complex Cases: 3 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	35.8 parties avg	5.8	50%
Partial	37.8 parties avg	7.8	50%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	17%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Aik Leng Mark's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	3(43%)	43%
Won	1(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	171,000.00	42,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Marchmont Pte Ltd v Campbell Hospitality Pte Ltd: Forfeiture, Lease Termination & Holding Over Dispute 01 May 2024 Wang Cuirong (Defendant)Lost	01 May 2024	Wang Cuirong (Defendant): Liable under the Deed of GuaranteeLiable under the Deed of Guarantee for the sums Campbell is liable to pay to Marchmont under the Tenancy Agreement.
2	PP v Masui: Prevention of Corruption Act & Penalty for Accepting Gratification 29 Dec 2021 Takaaki Masui (Respondent, Applicant)Lost	29 Dec 2021	Takaaki Masui (Respondent, Applicant): Criminal motion dismissedThe Court dismissed Masui's criminal motion.
3	Toh Wee Ping Benjamin v Grande Corp: Striking Out Defence & Assessment of Damages 13 May 2020 Goh Bee Heong (Appellant, Defendant)Partial	13 May 2020	Goh Bee Heong (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part with costs to the appellants which we fixed at $15,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. We set aside the part of the Judge’s decision below in relation to the Sums Received but affirmed the Assessment Judgment in respect of the Loans. The cost orders below were not disturbed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
4	Alvin Nicholas Nathan v Raffles Assets: Breach of Tenancy Agreement & Damages Claim 19 Jan 2015 Alvin Nicholas Nathan (Plaintiff)Won	19 Jan 2015	Alvin Nicholas Nathan (Plaintiff): Judgment for the plaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $170,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). Includes $150,000 for wasted costs and $20,000 for inconvenience.
5	Zim Integrated Shipping Services v Dafni Igal: Fiduciary Duty & Rebates 01 Dec 2010 Star Shipping Agencies (Singapore) Pte Limited (Appellant)Lost	01 Dec 2010	Star Shipping Agencies (Singapore) Pte Limited (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed. No monetary amount specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore: Review of Taxation of Costs 20 Feb 2003 Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Applicant, Appellant)Partial	20 Feb 2003	Wee Soon Kim Anthony (Applicant, Appellant): Disbursement Claim ReducedSum claimed by Mr Wee under item 29 reduced to $1,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).