Goh Chui Ling

Goh Chui Ling is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and construction torts.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in breach of contract and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Breach of Contract	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Duty to design	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ duties	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Torts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Duty as to materials and workmanship	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Acknowledgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraudulent Acts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Electronic Records	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Standard of Proof for Fraud	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Limitation Period	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Proof of evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Duty	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Chui Ling has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Chui Ling has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Edmond Pereira Law Corporation	4 cases	100% of cases	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner'(Nov 2019) Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor Negligence(Mar 2019) Super Group Ltd v Mysore Nagaraja Kartik: Breach of Contract, Electronic Records & Limitation(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Chui Ling's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.8
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Partial	33.0 parties avg	3.0	75%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Chui Ling's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25%)	25%
Partial	3(75%)	75%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	600,000.00	600,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Partial: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Orion-One v MCST: Construction Defects, Locus Standi, and Interpretation of 'Good and Workmanlike Manner' 14 Nov 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	14 Nov 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (suing on behalf of itself and all subsidiary proprietors of Northstar @ AMK) (Respondent, Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal allowed in partThe MCST's appeal was allowed in part regarding the admissibility of LOAs.
2	Management Corporation v Orion-One: Construction Defects & Contractor Negligence 26 Mar 2019 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff)Partial	26 Mar 2019	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 3556 (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for the Plaintiff in part in respect of the defects the court found Orion-One and Sanchoon to be liable for. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Super Group Ltd v Mysore Nagaraja Kartik: Breach of Contract, Electronic Records & Limitation 13 Sep 2018 Mysore Nagaraja Kartik (Defendant)Lost	13 Sep 2018	Mysore Nagaraja Kartik (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantInterlocutory judgment entered against the defendant for US$600,000 (assumed USD, as the debt was denominated in USD).
4	Rohini Balasubramaniam v HSR International Realtors: Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Property Transactions 04 Jul 2018 Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial	04 Jul 2018	Rohini d/o Balasubramaniam (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part; Rohini is entitled to 30% of the amount claimed due to contributory negligence. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.