Goh En-Ci Gloria

Goh En-Ci Gloria is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in trademarks and copyrights. Their track record shows a 43.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated expertise across 18 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and trademarks.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	17% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Trademarks	4 cases	14% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 14% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Copyrights	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Trademark Infringement	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Confidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Passing Off	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trademark Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Intellectual Property Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh En-Ci Gloria has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh En-Ci Gloria has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Allen & Gledhill LLP	5 cases	83% of cases	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark(Apr 2022) Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion(Feb 2021) COMPASS v SingNet: Copyright Tribunal's Power to Grant Retrospective Orders(Oct 2020)
Allen & Glenhill LLP	1 cases	17% of cases	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester'(Feb 2015)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh En-Ci Gloria's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.8
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	32.0 parties avg	2.0	50%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	17%
Won	34.4 parties avg	4.4	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh En-Ci Gloria's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(43%)	43%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	3(43%)	43%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,000.00	1,600.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Combe International Ltd v Dr August Wolff: Trademark Opposition & VAGISAN Mark 06 Apr 2022 Combe International Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	06 Apr 2022	Combe International Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Dr. August Wolff v. Combe: Trade Mark Invalidity & Likelihood of Confusion 24 Feb 2021 Combe International Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	24 Feb 2021	Combe International Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application for Invalidity AllowedApplication for invalidity of the plaintiff's trade mark allowed; awarded costs of the appeal fixed at $7,500 (inclusive of disbursements) from the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	COMPASS v SingNet: Copyright Tribunal's Power to Grant Retrospective Orders 12 Oct 2020 SingNet Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Oct 2020	SingNet Pte Ltd (Respondent): WonThe court answered the question in the negative, in favor of the respondent's submission.
4	I-Admin v Hong Ying Ting: Copyright Infringement, Breach of Confidence, and Contract Dispute 13 May 2019 Li Yong (Defendant)Won	13 May 2019	Li Yong (Defendant): Claims DismissedClaims against Mr. Li Yong were dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Global Tobacco v Jamal: Trade Mark Invalidity for Cigarette Products 28 Sep 2015 Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Appellant)Lost	28 Sep 2015	Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of the appeal and proceedings below to be taxed if not agreed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Al Mahamid v Global Tobacco: Trade Mark Invalidation for Cigarette Brand 'Manchester' 10 Feb 2015 Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Defendant)Lost	10 Feb 2015	Global Tobacco Manufacturers (International) Sdn Bhd (Defendant): Trade Mark InvalidationTrade Mark No. T1208253B for “Manchester and M device” registered in Class 34 in the name of the Defendant is declared invalid under s 23(3)(a)(i) read with s 8(2)(b) of the Act. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.