Goh Mu Quan

Goh Mu Quan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2018 to 2021. The lawyer has handled 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in garnishee orders and joint accounts. Their track record shows a 33.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 33% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated expertise across 19 primary practice areas, with significant experience in civil procedure and garnishee orders.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Civil Procedure	3 cases	12% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Orders	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Joint Accounts	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Remedies	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Debt Recovery	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Accounting	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held by bank	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Assignment and attachment of money held in bank	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Goh Mu Quan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Mu Quan has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 3 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	3 cases	100% of cases	Timing Limited v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders & Joint Accounts Dispute(Jan 2021) Timing Ltd v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders and Joint Bank Accounts(Aug 2020) Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Mu Quan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.8
Complex Cases: 1 (33%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	25.3 parties avg	5.3	67%
Won	13.0 parties avg	3.0	33%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Mu Quan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(67%)	67%
Won	1(33%)	33%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Timing Limited v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders & Joint Accounts Dispute 10 Jan 2021 Timing Limited (Appellant)Lost	10 Jan 2021	Timing Limited (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision to not grant a final garnishee order in relation to the two joint accounts was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Timing Ltd v Tay Toh Hin: Garnishee Orders and Joint Bank Accounts 10 Aug 2020 Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won	10 Aug 2020	Timing Limited (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, holding that a show cause order under Order 49 of the Rules of Court can be made against joint accounts where certain criteria are met.
3	Cheong Soh Chin v Eng Chiet Shoong: Fiduciary Duties, Account on Wilful Default 27 Sep 2018 C S Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Sep 2018	C S Partners Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim Partially DismissedClaim partially dismissed; the exact monetary amount will be determined after hearing parties on interest, costs, and the form of the judgment. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.