Goh Teck Wee

Goh Teck Wee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2004 to 2017. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and murder. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated expertise across 25 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	5 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Murder	4 cases	9% of total caseload	Highly Specialized96% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Offences	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Confessions	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Intervention	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Relationship Dispute	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Domestic Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Framework	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Sentencing Appeals	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Goh Teck Wee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Goh Teck Wee has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Goh Chang JP and Wong	4 cases	50% of cases	Lee Harith Gary v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal Dismissed(Nov 2004) Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence(Jul 2004) Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary: Murder Conviction for Pushing Girlfriend from Building(Apr 2004)
Goh JP & Wong	2 cases	25% of cases	Tan Boon Heng v Lau Pang Cheng David: Principles Governing Review of Registrar's Decision on Damages Assessment(Sep 2013) Lau Pang Cheng David v Tan Boon Heng: Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment for Neck Injury and Loss of Earnings(Oct 2012)
Goh JP & Wong LLC	1 cases	13% of cases	PP v Koh Thiam Huat: Dangerous Driving & Sentencing Principles(May 2017)
Lee Mun Hooi & Co	1 cases	13% of cases	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute(Jan 2017)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Teck Wee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.2 parties avg	2.2	75%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Teck Wee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(75%)	75%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	15,000.00	3,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	PP v Koh Thiam Huat: Dangerous Driving & Sentencing Principles 24 May 2017 Koh Thiam Huat (Respondent)Lost	24 May 2017	Koh Thiam Huat (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the original fine of $3,000 was ordered to be refunded. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Sin Herh Construction v Hyundai Engineering: Interim Injunction & Performance Bond Call Dispute 08 Jan 2017 Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	08 Jan 2017	Sin Herh Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application for an interim injunction and Erinford Order was dismissed.
3	Tan Boon Heng v Lau Pang Cheng David: Principles Governing Review of Registrar's Decision on Damages Assessment 03 Sep 2013 Lau Pang Cheng David (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won	03 Sep 2013	Lau Pang Cheng David (Respondent, Plaintiff): Judgment for RespondentAppeal dismissed with costs fixed at $12,000 to the respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Lau Pang Cheng David v Tan Boon Heng: Road Traffic Accident, Damages Assessment for Neck Injury and Loss of Earnings 30 Oct 2012 Tan Boon Heng (Respondent, Defendant)Won	30 Oct 2012	Tan Boon Heng (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal UpheldAppeal upheld; the original decision of the AR was affirmed. The court assumed the currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Lee Harith Gary v Public Prosecutor: Murder Conviction Appeal Dismissed 07 Nov 2004 Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Appellant)Lost	07 Nov 2004	Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the murder conviction was dismissed.
6	Mohd Raffiq v PP: Murder Conviction Appeal - False Confessions & DNA Evidence 23 Jul 2004 Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Appellant)Lost	23 Jul 2004	Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against his conviction for murder was dismissed.
7	Public Prosecutor v Lee Harith Gary: Murder Conviction for Pushing Girlfriend from Building 21 Apr 2004 Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Defendant)Lost	21 Apr 2004	Lee Harith Gary (alias Lee Cheng Thiam) (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced according to the law.
8	Public Prosecutor v Mohd Raffiq: Murder Conviction Based on Retracted Confession 16 Mar 2004 Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Defendant)Lost	16 Mar 2004	Mohd Raffiq Bin Mohd Aslam (Defendant): Convicted of MurderAccused was found guilty of murder and sentenced to death.