Gokul Haridas

Gokul Haridas is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2014 to 2014. The lawyer has handled 1 case in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and damages.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gokul Haridas has demonstrated expertise across 10 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Medical Negligence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Loss of Earning Capacity	1 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Gokul Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gokul Haridas has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 1 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
M Rama Law Corporation	1 cases	100% of cases	Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury(Nov 2014)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gokul Haridas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gokul Haridas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 1 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Teddy, Thomas v Teacly (S) Pte Ltd: Assessment of Damages for Personal Injury 05 Nov 2014 Teacly (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Partial	05 Nov 2014	Teacly (S) Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe appeal was allowed in part. The awards made by the AR in respect of loss of pre-trial earnings and loss of future earnings were set aside. Instead, the plaintiff was awarded $180,000 as loss of earning capacity (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).