Gokulamurali s/o Haridas

Gokulamurali s/o Haridas is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2023. The lawyer has handled 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and unjust enrichment. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated expertise across 22 primary practice areas, with significant experience in torts and negligence.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Torts	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Negligence	3 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	2 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal injuries cases	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Statutory Duty	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Nuisance	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Gokulamurali s/o Haridas has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 4 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tito Isaac & Co LLP	4 cases	100% of cases	Poongothai Kuppusamy v Huationg Contractor: Damages for Personal Injuries from Road Traffic Accident(Aug 2023) Ice Messaging Pte Ltd v Ng Chee Heung: Unjust Enrichment & Unauthorized Payments(Jan 2022) Ooi Say Peng v Koh Kai Chuan Raymond: Striking Out Claims in Construction Dispute(May 2021)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Gokulamurali s/o Haridas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.2
Complex Cases: 2 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.3 parties avg	3.3	75%
Partial	19.0 parties avg	9.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	27.3 parties avg	7.3
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Gokulamurali s/o Haridas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75%)	75%
Partial	1(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,146,708.76	573,354.382 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Poongothai Kuppusamy v Huationg Contractor: Damages for Personal Injuries from Road Traffic Accident 03 Aug 2023 Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	03 Aug 2023	Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantDefendant found liable and ordered to pay S$838,224.52 (Singapore Dollars) in damages to the plaintiff. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Ice Messaging Pte Ltd v Ng Chee Heung: Unjust Enrichment & Unauthorized Payments 27 Jan 2022 Wong Thai Hian (Defendant)Lost	27 Jan 2022	Wong Thai Hian (Defendant): Claim DismissedJudgment against Wong in the sum of $133,495.90 with interest from the date of the writ of summons (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Ooi Say Peng v Koh Kai Chuan Raymond: Striking Out Claims in Construction Dispute 26 May 2021 ZPT Engineering Services (Defendant)Partial	26 May 2021	ZPT Engineering Services (Defendant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; certain claims for mandatory injunctions against this defendant were struck out, but the action continues against them for damages.
4	Poongothai Kuppusamy v Huationg Contractor: Negligence & Vicarious Liability in Road Traffic Accident 02 May 2021 Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2021	Huationg Contractor Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against the Defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.