Govin Menon

Govin Menon is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2000. The lawyer has handled 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and libel, slander and defamation. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Govin Menon has demonstrated expertise across 11 primary practice areas, with significant experience in copyrights and civil practice.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Copyrights	2 cases	17% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 17% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Libel, Slander and Defamation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Search Warrants	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Implied Undertaking	1 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Govin Menon has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Govin Menon has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 2 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Manjit Samuel & Partners	2 cases	100% of cases	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation(Apr 2000) Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking(Mar 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Govin Menon's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 9.0
Complex Cases: 2 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%
Won	19.0 parties avg	9.0	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	29.0 parties avg	9.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Govin Menon's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(50%)	50%
Won	1(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Business Software Alliance v SM Summit: Discovery, Implied Undertaking & Defamation 23 Apr 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Dismissed	23 Apr 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Applications for striking out dismissedApplications for striking out the defendants' applications for discovery were dismissed. (Currency assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore).
2	Microsoft v SM Summit: Jurisdiction, Criminal Procedure Code & Implied Undertaking 08 Mar 2000 Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	08 Mar 2000	Summit CD Manufacture Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.